Yep. I think that if we could use the same conventions in both places, it
would be nice.
Not a requirement, just a nice-to-have... I realize that the styles don't
currently match.
Mike
Rafael Vanoni wrote:
Michael Pogue wrote:
I was thinking mostly in terms of matching the existing naming
conventions...
Most opensource/community projects seem to be coming in under
cat=="utility".
e.g. utility/top, utility/squid, utility/timidity, utility/emacs, etc.
(by my count,
there are ~234 of these right now under product=="solaris", and many
of the 234 are
community-oriented projects).
I don't think defect.opensolaris.org has a 'utility' category, are you
referring to bugster ?
Rafael
Mike
Rafael Vanoni wrote:
Michael Pogue wrote:
Better might be: utility/latencytop
Mike
I think performance/latencytop might be a better one because the main
categories in defect.os.org are community/project oriented. There are
a number of utilities already being tracked in different categories
that would also fall under a general utility category.
From a different perspective, having a category for performance
would create a place for OpenSolaris performance related bugs. Where
we could have different subcategories aside from LatencyTOP.
Both options are kitchen sinks of some sort, IMHO the latter would be
more appropriate.
Rafael
Krishnendu Sadhukhan wrote:
Since latencytop has been made available to the OpenSolaris
community, we now need a new bug category/subcategory for filing
bugs against this tool. Since this tool is used to find out system
and application latencies, in order to improve system and
application performance, I would like to propose the following :
performance/latencytop
Please let me know if anyone has any comments on this.
Thanks,
Krish
_______________________________________________
perf-discuss mailing list
perf-discuss@opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
perf-discuss mailing list
perf-discuss@opensolaris.org
