Yeah, sorry I was just so surprised with what I read and posted it to the list without thinking clearly.
I did think it worth sharing with people here, and considered sending it privately but couldn't be bothered to pick out all the addresses of those who might be interested. In hindsight, with his quietness it was unnecessary - however at the time he was spouting it would have been useful to put his 'facts' into context. When his lack of posts became apparent I wished I could retract it, but too late... Again apologies and I will refrain from mentioning him again. > -----Original Message----- > From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 23 November 2002 01:49 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: What was dobo saying a year ago...and what he's > saying now to this group. > > > I don't know why I'm wading into this. I'm only going to get > myself into trouble, but here I go... > > A lot of folks on this list don't like Brad. That's fine. A > lot of folks on this list are outraged by what he says, who > he says it to, and are clearly upset by the amount of and > content of his posts. > > Knowing Brad's propensity of answering each and every post > directed to him, why then dig up something that he posted on > another list a year ago, and re-post it here? So that Brad > will respond, and then we can all crap on him in outrage? > > My initial reaction (I'm just being honest here) when I read > Rob's post, was, "What, is Rob baiting Brad here?" > > I'm not defending Brad; he seems more than capable of doing > that himself. But, if people on this list are tired of his > posts, why draw him in? > > Sorry if I've ruffled feathers or stepped on toes, but let's > not let this get any sillier than it's become. > > regards, > frank > > Bob Blakely wrote: > > > Original Message ----- > > > > > Hey Rob, group, > > > > > > It is sad you some are going out digging out things on me. Very > > > sad. Why kind of list is this? > > > > You are not... nice, and I don't... like you because of your rude, > > arrogant behavior. I'm sure that there are others who feel the same > > way. Perhaps (of > > course) there are others who think you're just... dandy. > > > > There are some folks on this list who've been here a long > time and are > > respected. They earned this respect over time. You chose to > attempt to > > bully them. I don't like it, especially since you continue to > > "intellectualize" your behavior in an attempt to appear not only > > innocent but victumized. Given your continued propensity > for... crap, > > I don't believe your claim that (much of) your past rude > behavior was > > the result of someone "spoofing" you by using your name as was > > claimed. > > > > I hope this post is sufficiently simple for you to understand. I > > expect a reply that wherein all (except you) see an example > of who you > > are. You will think it a scathing and witty reply for which > all will > > admire you. > > -- > "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. > The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer > > >
