Hey Rob, group, It is sad you some are going out digging out things on me. Very sad. Why kind of list is this? Shouldn't you be more concerned with Pentax? The message for me is long forgotten, but it's of little value as you have stated it. This email is doubt a waste. Really, I don't even believe I wrote what you posted. I'm not saying 'I DID NOT!!' But at that time, I think I owned the MZ-S, maybe not, could be wrong, which makes me feel odd about this. Sure I'm wrong a lot of times. So many here have the experience on me (why I say this to people that enjoy putting me down, I don't know, maybe I'm just too honest and good a person) Yes, you should take anything I say with a pinch of salt, I do it with the rest of you, it should be common. This list is helpful, but by no means should someone decide to do something based purely on what is said here. I've been keeping quiet through all these posts, and things still come up. It's silly. You're adults. It's a an out of control obsession here. Instead of going at me or anyone, just do your camera/photography thing.
I've grown tired of the nonsense, and while I'm not an innocent, it's gone way too far. I've taken care of things on this end, via my ISP. I made comments to a private email that was posted on-list, shows you the character of some. It has not been posted, as the reply was silly and I stated things very simply. No wonder it doesn't show up, it's hard to attack. I'm sure you could if you wanted however. Anyhow, if any of that does come out, or anything else, I'm no longer involved and have be coming to beyond caring what some say here, as I know 'what' you really are. I hope you have fun and further discuss me, but some of you should know better and stick to the real purpose of this list. Don't follow any of my past examples as you have, they aren't very good. I shall for the moment ask question to good people privately, and stay off the list, it shouldn't matter you all, as a filter/ignore/delete works unless you have mean intentions. Anyhow, as it is, you should be happy. I'll be around. God bless, Brad Dobo. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rob Brigham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 1:11 PM Subject: What was dobo saying a year ago... > Obviously before he came here, I found this on Photozone... > > Interesting that the camera he now lauds as the flagship that gives him > his cred was considered "not really very 'professional'", below the > PZ-1p and "will not do well"!! > > How wrong he was/is. > > Just shows that he does preach what he has no idea as the gospel and > then changes his mind once he has some actual experience - therefore you > should take anything he says with a pinch of salt. > > http://www.cmpsolv.com/photozone/pentaxforum/messages/698.htm > > Posted by Brad Dobo on September 30, 2001 at 14:47:58: > In Reply to: Re: ZX-5n, PZ-1p or MZ-S posted by Yves Simon on September > 15, 2001 at 22:51:51: > > The ZX/MZ-5n is the way to go. PZ-1p is the 'professional' version, but > for many things is lacking. The MZ-S will not do well (mark my words) > and you won't see it around much, or it'll get a makeover (like the > ZX/MZ-5), yes it has lots of new bells and whistles, and in some > respects it is better, but it's still small, not really very > 'professional' in my opinion. When I tried it, it was small in my hands, > even with the battery grip. So is the 5n, right? Yup, but it's a solid > camera and a hell of a lot cheaper! > > > I have a ZX-5n, and was thinking about buying the MZ-S. But I am > waiting. > > > The MZ-S is way too expensive, its additional features compared to the > ZX-5n are not > > critical for 99% of the photos I am taking, and its shutter seems to > be precies up to > > 1/1000s only (like the ZX-5n). I had one in my hands, and I didn't > like the ergonomy ; > > the ZX-5n is very, very nice to use. >
