I have no problem with non Pentax images, but maybe while we’re making changes 
we could move the PUG into the 21st century by doubling the image size. 
Paul

> On Jun 5, 2024, at 7:21 PM, Brian Walters <bria...@lyons-ryan.org> wrote:
> 
> On 6/06/2024 8:09 am, John Francis wrote:
>> Maybe it's time to add a section to the PUG for images created with 
>> non-Pentax
>> gear. Or maybe it isn't - I don't know hom many other non-Pentax using 
>> PDMLers
>> are still around.
>> --
>> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> To unsubscribe send an email topdml-le...@pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
> 
> That's an idea that has been raised before and always rejected - but that was 
> when there were more active PDMLers.
> 
> Like you, I've moved to Olympus. I've tried adapting Pentax lenses to the Oly 
> bodies so that I could post something recent, but it's not an arrangement I'm 
> comfortable with (mainly due to lack of autofocus).
> 
> Maybe it is time to look at opening up the PUG to non-Pentax equipment again?
> 
> Cheers Brian
> 
> 
> --
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> www.avast.com
> --
> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to