On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 09:32:25AM +0100, Henk Terhell wrote: > I agree a cheap Epson model photo scanner (like the $100 Epson V39II) will > do the job. > However, I don't think scanning of ordinary prints at higher than 300 dpi > is worthwhile as results will not become better. > This in contrast with scanning of negatives or slides.
I think 300 dpi might be a bit low. Many home printers nowadays can print at 1200 (or even 2400) dpi, so presumably there's some extra information available at more than 300dpi on physical media. That being said, though, I've found scanning at 600dpi to be good enough for pretty much anything I've done. -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
