Some low light shots processed to taste by me, for your viewing pleasure (or lack thereof :-) )
All shot with EM-1 and Mitakon 25/0.95 https://www.flickr.com/photos/borispdml/30852167131 https://www.flickr.com/photos/borispdml/30638861740 https://www.flickr.com/photos/borispdml/31964793771 https://www.flickr.com/photos/borispdml/31964791041 Boris On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 8:30 PM, Larry Colen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Boris Liberman wrote: >> >> My reply is inline, below. >> >> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 9:08 PM, Larry Colen<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Something I've been meaning to try for long time, but it seems that I >>>> will have to put it off. The sensor of EM-1 is not very good in noise >>>> department... >>> >>> >>> You may know of Ctein, who occasionally writes for The Online >>> Photographer: >>> http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/ctein/ >> >> >> Some time ago Ctein (I am sure you'll get all the laughs out there >> when you will hear me trying to pronounce this) and Mike Johnston >> appeared to have some kind of fall out. But I don't follow TOP closely >> enough to be up to date. My impression of Ctein was that he is a >> master printer. >> >>> He and I were at the same New Years Eve party, and had both brought some >>> prints. He was showing off photos that he had taken of the Aurora in >>> Canada >>> last summer with micro 4/3. The photos were gorgeous, but I could really >>> tell the difference between the u4/3 sensor and the Pentax APS and FF >>> sensors. >> >> >> I would really appreciate if you elaborated here. Can be off-list if >> you think it is more appropriate. I am thinking of buying one of these >> Sony A7* cameras and Sony to Leica adapter (I already have very good >> Leica to Pentax adapter) to serve as a digital back for my lenses: >> M-mount Biogons 25/2.8 and 35/2.0 and Pentaxes A 50/1.2 and FA 77/1.2 > > > I think you mean 77/1.8, if there's a 1.2 version of that lens, I'm really > interested. :-) > > I'm more than a little tempted to get a Sony body for all of my other random > lenses, but I'm probably a lot better off selling them and getting new > lenses. Although most of the lenses that I'm really interested in are > available in Nikon mount. A 135/2.0 could be really fun. > >> (I would think that no commas are needed, which makes this portion of >> the sentence quite funny, don't you think?). For AF stuff Oly will do >> nicely, but I wanna know more about that difference that you could >> tell... > > > The photos were at ISO 800, and were noisier, for example, than this shot at > 6400 > https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/28084127086/in/album-72157678418984536/ > I'd say night time performance is on the order of that of the K20. >> >> >> Boris >> > > -- > Larry Colen [email protected] (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
