On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 7:24 PM, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Nov 25, 2013, at 6:21 PM, Bruce Walker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Oh yeah: then there's the issue of the PDML list itself. I could be >> mistaken, but I find I get a pretty lukewarm reception to images of >> models fully clothed, and downright chilly to semi-nude and nude ones. >> Posting anything "pornier" than that (and uncovered genitals would be >> interpreted that way I fear) could bring out the pitchforks and >> torches. I can't be the only PESO pusher who has had that reaction. >> The PDML has no appetite for it. > > I posted some tasteful rear-view candle-lit female nudes about a dozen years > ago. From the lefties I got the "objectifying women" spiel and from the other > end of the spectrum I got the "children might be looking" nonsense. It got > ugly, and I left the list for a while. Not all the whiners, BTW, were U.S. > residents.
As I have not received any negative reactions to my recent images (and heaven knows I've tried to provoke some) then I suggest that the PDML has improved in the last 12 years. On nude images it has gone from open hostility to cold indifference. ;-) -- -bmw -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
