Not really, equality of opportunity is not equity of outcome. I don't think that anyone here is turning models down because of their plumbing or sexual identity.
Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> wrote: > >On Nov 25, 2013, at 2:24 PM, Walt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 11/25/2013 1:22 PM, Aahz Maruch wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013, Walt wrote: >>>> The question seems to boil down to why women and men are treated >>>> differently as photographic subjects. Well, it's because they're >>>> different. >>> ...and why do you think they're different? >> Because they're so easily distinguishable. > >And if they're not easily distinguishable, they could be transsexuals. >I'm wondering: If we give equal "exposure" to male nudes, shouldn't we >also give equal exposure to transsexuals? And maybe break that down >into categories: per-op and post-op transsexuals? Male to female and >female to male transsexuals? Hmmm. Equality sure can get complicated >these days. > >Paul > > >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above >and follow the directions. -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
