You sound comfortably set. Jack ;-]
----- Original Message ----- From: Ann Sanfedele <[email protected]> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> Cc: Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 5:32 PM Subject: Re: OT: Tv tech question - ah-ha It was a bad cable box... I got a new HD one .. and , jsut for good measure ... a nicely inexpensive HD TV 24" as large as I could tolerate.. Now I have the 24" in the main viewing area (my office) , the old sd set in the kitchen attached to the cable box with RCA cables, and one in the bedroom attached with red/green/blue rca cables. Now I don't have to move any of them . The TV was $149 and "I dont have to pay for it" because I have a PC Richard credit card :-) 2 month in advance birthday present to myself ann On 9/30/2013 14:54, John wrote: > On 9/30/2013 1:38 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote: >> On 30/9/13, Ann Sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed: >> >>> Came home, and as a result of the new box (not HD) I now can view >>> NOTHING without extreme pixilation and bad sound. >> >> This is a reception issue. >> >> Try a signal-booster - where is the antennae? >> > > Shouldn't need a signal booster for cable. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
