The 165/4LS focuses to 5.1 feet, which leaves you with a head and shoulders. Just about right for most portraits. Paul
"Brian Campbell (PM)" wrote: > On 25 Mar 2002 at 15:34, Aaron Reynolds wrote: > > > He's also interested in lenses in > > the 150mm range, for portraiture...do any of our Brothers have > > favourites? > > For portraits definintely the 165 F4 LS for me. > Haven't bought mine yet (soon though) so I can't > remember whether or not an extension is required. > I've also done portraits very successfully with the > 105 F2.4 that came with my 67II. Sometimes > requires a bit of cropping but there's *plenty* of > room on the negative for that. > > Cheers! > BC > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
