Of course the difference is that one can't quantify art. At least not the same say one can quantify a timed race against a stopwatch.
I guess one could use sale prices in which case Gursky is twenty thousand times better than me since he's sold a photo for over four million as opposed to my $200 (at least I think it's that amount; it's been so long...). cheers, frank "What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof." -- Christopher Hitchens --- Original Message --- From: Matthew Hunt <[email protected]> Sent: August 11, 2012 8/11/12 To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: OT: British thighs are the Envy of the World On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 10:58 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > All that to be 30% slower than the world's best (who regularly do the flying > 200 in under 10 seconds. Look at it this way: I'd be pretty damned happy if my photographs were 30% worse than the world's best. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
