It looks fine, but it's a fairly standard kind of abstract, and it's not
really a photograph. It started out as one but it isn't one any more.
The fact is It's mechanically reproduced artwork like a lithograph even
lithographs have more variation. A silver print produced by even the
most consistent human printer will be in some way unique there will
always be some variation. This can be stamped out by a machine.
On 11/10/2011 3:46 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
all I see is the jpg - where is the article ?
actually, I rather like the look of it
ann
On 11/10/2011 11:12, P. J. Alling wrote:
Well there's a new "Most -valuable- _expensive_ photograph in the
world!" and it's just barely a photograph, being heavily Photoshopped.
You know people can spend their money on anything they want, but
sometimes I just don't understand the collectors "instinct".
http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/.a/6a00df351e888f8834015392ecf0e9970b-800wi
Some elements removed in Photoshop.
--
Don't lose heart! They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a
lengthily search.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
