Well I clip , below, the comment of one "feathured" commenter in Mike's magazine... which pretty much expresses my feeling about it...

thanks for sending that link, Brian - I had no idea how much was paid for it...

"Featured Comment by david wen riccardi-zhu: "I like it. A lot. I like much of Gursky's work; elements of his aesthetics appeal to my personality. I like the rigidity, purity, and stoicism it evokes. It is a kind of conceptualization; a very bare way to approach the idea of a river. Minimalistic, brief, concise. I would dislike a more romantic approach, although there is still some feeling in the photograph. At least, that's what I see. Some of us like naturalism, others prefer abstraction.

"That said, I don't have to think of this as a photograph. That term I maybe do reserve for an image which strives for more fidelity to reality (whatever that is). If one wants to label this as a sort of digital painting, that's fine by me. I don't let labels interfere with my enjoyment of a work.

"As for the money, it is, in my opinion, ridiculous. I think artists do deserve compensation for their work—it is a tough, competitive profession, and one that requires much dedication. That said, it is difficult to understand the obsession of making art into a sort of luxury, when the majority struggle to make a living, if not to survive. There is something perverse about money being spent in this way."


ann

On 11/10/2011 15:51, Brian Walters wrote:
Ann

Try this;

http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2011/11/and-we-have-a-new-winner.html


Cheers

Brian

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/

On Thursday, November 10, 2011 3:46 PM, "Ann Sanfedele"
<[email protected]>  wrote:
all I see is the jpg   - where is the article ?

actually, I rather like the look of it

ann

On 11/10/2011 11:12, P. J. Alling wrote:
Well there's a new "Most -valuable- _expensive_ photograph in the
world!" and it's just barely a photograph, being heavily Photoshopped.
You know people can spend their money on anything they want, but
sometimes I just don't understand the collectors "instinct".

http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/.a/6a00df351e888f8834015392ecf0e9970b-800wi


Some elements removed in Photoshop.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to