>I TOTALLY disagree. By standardizing on the smaller size of the CCD >(not the resolution) the can now proceed to design faster >smaller optics with better DOF than by using a 35mm size sensor. >As long as the resolution isnt fixed, they can continue to >design higher and higher rez cameras using the smae optics. >It's a great idea. There is nothing to say that a kmount >adapter couldnt be developed either.
But isn't this the arguement used on the evil APS too? >If high resolution sensors can be developed using a smaller sensor >ALL of the optics become smaller, cheaper, lighter, faster. Why >would you want to use 35mm format sensor size except to use OLD bulky >lenses? But the question is, how small is small enough? And how small human hands can be (to operate the equipments)? regards, Alan Chan _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
