IMO it will sell just fine. Pentax may not know as much as Canikon
about AF and metering but they've proven quite some marketing instinct
lately!

2011/7/14 Steven Desjardins <[email protected]>:
> I think we all underestimate this as a sales tool.
>
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Christine Aguila
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I see the Q as just total play--therefore, I want one!  Cheers, Christine
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jens" <[email protected]>
>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 12:42 AM
>> Subject: Re: Re: Pentax Q preview
>>
>>
>> Is this small or is it really small:
>> http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/PENTAXQ/PENTAXQA.HTM
>>
>> Jens
>>
>> --
>> Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself.
>>
>> On Jul 13, 2011 00:25 "Jaume Lahuerta" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> ----- Mensaje original -----
>>> > De: Carlos R. <[email protected]>
>>> > Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>>> > CC:
>>> > Enviado: miércoles 13 de julio de 2011 0:08
>>> > Asunto: Re: Pentax Q preview
>>> >
>>> > El 12/07/2011 23:59, Jaume Lahuerta escribió:
>>> >>  Thanks Carlos,
>>> >>
>>> >>  The body feel and ergonomics surpassed their expectations, but
>>> >>  they are
>>> > worried about the image quality that it will be able to achieve...
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>  Regards,
>>> >>  Jaume
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > Only time will tell, Jaume. You can't expect APS-C sensor quality,
>>> > but
>>> > sensors have been getting better all the time (see the K-5, when
>>> > many
>>> > people thought APS-C DSLRs couldn't improve their IQ), so I think it
>>> >
>>> > will better than many people think know.
>>> >
>>> > Carlos
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sure Carlos,
>>>
>>> The problem is that sensor IQ
>>> evolve regardless of its size, so current small sensor IQ can be
>>> similar to older bigger sensor IQ, but it will always be worse than
>>> the current
>>> bigger ones. And I am afraid that this will be the comparison...even
>>> if the results are decent enough for many purposes, and I am sure they
>>> will.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Jaume
>>>
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>>> follow the directions.
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>> follow the directions.
>>
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>> follow the directions.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Steve Desjardins
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
>

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to