I'm not a strict advocate of the lomography approach, but I appreciate the spirit. Always carry a small camera with sufficient IQ that is always at the ready. I have a pixel peeper personality but that's because I've always taken mainly macros and stills. If I lived in an urban environment I might be all over this camera. The only real thing I would miss is the upper end of the iso scale, but I also grew up thinking 80 was impossibly fast.
Hey Frank, what do you think about all this? You've always been a "get the shot and hope the IQ is good enough" kind of guy and you've made that work in a most admirable way over the years. As an archetypal lomographer, I could see you as the perfect test pilot for a Q. Of course, I don't make those decisions for the corporation. ;-) On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:32 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > LOL. It is a fascinating look, small body with a fat lens. Freud is rolling > in his grave. > > On , Krisjanis Linkevics <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 2:26 PM >> >> > >> >> > There is clearly a market for the finely >> >> > made pocket camera and the Q will always have the size advantage, >> >> > which may be nearly as important as IQ for some. >> >> >> >> Now if they make a massive 15mm/f0.75 lens for it, count me in. I have a >> weird fascination with the Sony NEX that this would satisfy perfectly. >> >> >> >> kris >> >> >> >> -- >> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> >> [email protected] >> >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. >> >> -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
