Thanks, Frank. As explained in my response to Ted, I realize it is a poor scan, and I am hoping to improve on it. Do you have any other suggestions, assuming I find the negative and and get a good scan of it?
Dan On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 2:40 PM, frank theriault <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Theodore Beilby <[email protected]> > wrote: >> The lack of sharpness in this image makes it hard for me to really like this >> image. I think it is a very interesting subject and I realize that it >> was probably shot on film and scanned so that may be part of the reason for >> the >> lack of sharpness. I probably would have composed the image a little >> differently >> if it was possible. The center heavy location of the church is what bothers >> me >> the most. I would have lowered it in the frame and had it more to the left. >> Those are just my thoughts on it. > > I tend to agree with Ted on this one. Certainly has the seeds of a > terrific shot, though - the bad scan is the worst of it. > > cheers, > frank > > > > -- > "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
