I agree, I have a AF330FTZ and AF500FTZ and both are huge and make the MZ-3 top heavy, The AF500FTZ range and reach alone makes it worth while keeping
--- "Paris, Leonard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Personally, I find that a lot to give away just to > alleviate a problem like > being top heavy. Why not work out at the gym for a > while to get your hands > and wrists in shape? I recommend waiting until you > have the MZ-S in hand > before you dump the AF500FTZ, it's a great flash. > > Len > --- > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael St. Jean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:41 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: 500ftz or 360fgz > > > I have the 500ftz flash for my ZX-5n. Although it is > an exceptional > flash unit, I find it makes the ZX-5n, even with the > battery pack, top > heavy. I am considering selling the 500ftz and > buying the smaller (and I > assume) lighter 360fgz. > > I know that the 360's has a lower GN, lacks swivel, > and the wireless, > modeling, and high-sync features isl not be > supported with the older > model ZX's, but will the on-flash exposure > compensation function? > > I am stashing money away for a MZ-S or at least the > hopefully future > replacement for the ZX-5n, so eventually I will have > a body that > supports the features of the 360. > > Anything else I am missing if I make this switch? Is > it a good idea? or > should keep the 500ftz. Thanks. > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. > To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. > Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at > http://pug.komkon.org . > ______________________________________________________________________ Web-hosting solutions for home and business! http://website.yahoo.ca - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
