On 08/01/2010, P. J. Alling <[email protected]> wrote:
> I doubt it.  They just tested it with a card that had a shot on it labeled
> with a number around 9800+  They probably shot 50-100 shots to test the
> camera so you got 9900.
>
> To set it back use this procedure.
>
> 1.)  Put an take a shot. on a clean sd card.
>
> 2.)  On you PC/MAC/whatever flavor of LINIX/UNIX mount the card and renumber
> it to xxxx9999.xxx
>
> 3.) Put that card back into the camera take a two shots.
>
> Now all the photos you take will be in the \DCIM\200PENTX directory,  but
> the new number will be xxxx0001.xxx
>
> 4.) Take the card back to the computer and get rid of that directory and
> make sure there's a file in the 100PENTX directory numbered xxxx53xx.xxx.
> Basically  one number before the frame you want the counter to start at.
> (and yes I ended that sentence badly).
>
> 5.) Put the card back into the camera an make an exposure.
>
> At this point your frame counter will be back to where you want it.  The
> internal counter shutter counter won't agree, but it doesn't agree now most
> likely.

That's essentially how I've done it to bring replacement bodies into
line with my existing image numbers. Once the new number has been
adopted by the camera you can re-enable the memory function and it
won't lose track again.

-- 
Rob Studdert (Digital  Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to