On Fri, 07 Aug 2009 13:25 -0700, "Jack Davis" <[email protected]> wrote: > I had the DA*60~250 in mind, but first wanted to try the DA55~300. The > DA*60~250 has now been relegated to the back of my mind. >
Given its price it was never in the front of mine..... I've just picked up a 55-300 to replace my defective 80-320. I haven't had an opportunity to put it through its paces yet but, judging by your moon shot, I think I've made a good choice. Cheers Brian ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/ > > --- On Fri, 8/7/09, Toine <[email protected]> wrote: > > > From: Toine <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: PESO: DA 55~300 Moon > > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> > > Date: Friday, August 7, 2009, 10:59 AM > > I have mine for 1,5 year, at f/8 or > > around that it's near perfect. > > Never looked at the 60-250 ;) > > > > Toine > > > > 2009/8/7 Jack Davis <[email protected]>: > > > Playing with the DA 55~300. > > > This for those who may be curious. Web image only > > gives an indication of what I feel is its price belying > > capability. > > > > > > > > > Jack > > > > > > Comments welcome. > > > > > > K20D, F/8, ISO 100, 300MM, sturdy tripod, VERY heavy > > crop. > > > > > > http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=435 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Email service worth paying for. Try it for free -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
