"Paul F. Stregevsky" wrote:
> 
> Carlos,
> 
> This question appeared in PDML during the first half of 2001. Someone wrote
> that yes, you must use one of the filters; the filter is part of the lens
> formula. I have assumed that this is true. I don't have a problem on my
> Super Programs, so I've never felt the need to remove it. Thanks for
> sharing your unfortunate experience.
> 

Well, if that were the case, I still would be able to use the lens on
the Z-1 or SFX, although I'm trying to sell the latter. But I recall, if
I'm not wrong, that the messages you quoted were about the Zenitar 16
mm. 2.8, not the Mir 47-K.
As I have shot some slides without the filter, I'll take some with the
filter in place and will examine the results carefully.
The Russian member of the PDML I told you about uses the lens in an ME
Super, without the filter, as it causes the same problem in that body,
and he says the filter isn't needed for infinity focus. He even sent me
an URL for me to see some of the photos he had taken with the lens,
scanned with a 4000 dpi scanner.
Best wishes,

------------------------------------------------------------------
Carlos Royo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zaragoza (Aragon) - Spain
------------------------------------------------------------------
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to