I'm not working on RAW files. These were shot on film and put on a CD by Wally World.
Which is one major reason I'm looking to get my own scanner. Everything that I get back from either of the local one hour labs (WalMart or Walgreens) is extremely overexposed on the CD. I even intentionally underexposed a shot by three stops at one point just to make sure the problem didn't lie with me and the image on the CD came back washed out. It's extraordinarily frustrating. ~Nick David Wright http://pedalingprose.wordpress.com/ ----- Original Message ---- > From: Joseph McAllister <[email protected]> > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 3:29:31 PM > Subject: Re: GESO: Mitchell Family Farm take 2 > > Much better, but still pretty high key. > > If you are working on RAW images, it's still difficult to bring highlights > down, > much easier to bring shadows up. Over exposed highlights can only be brought > down to a level of grey - little detail shows up. > > I think you've done as well as you could on these. > > > On Feb 23, 2009, at 13:20 , Nick David Wright wrote: > > > > > A lot folks thought the highlights were too far gone on the first edit of > those photos. So I worked on them some more and wanted to get you all's > opinions > on this second batch. Thanks! > > > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/pedalingprose/sets/72157614352269184/ > > Joseph McAllister > Pentaxian > > http://gallery.me.com/jomac > http://web.me.com/jomac/show.me/Blog/Blog.html > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
