Who gives a f&%k what a camera is named?

People pissed & moaned about the *ist series, but still manage/d to
take photos with them.

DS

2009/2/19 JC OConnell <[email protected]>:
> Sorry, but KM and K-m are the only ones I hear as sounding the same. All
> those
> others are clearly different. "XN" sounds like TEN" to you? Not to me.
>
> JC O'Connell
> [email protected]
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Graydon
> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 6:31 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Whats with recent Pentax Camera names?
>
>
> This:
>
> K1000, KM, KX, MX, K2, K2DMD, ME Super, LX, ME, MV, MV1, MG, ME F, Super
> A, Super Program, Program A, Program Plus, A3, A3000, P3, P30, P3n,
> P30n, P30t, P5, P50, SFX, SF1, SF7, SF10, SFXn, SF1n, Z-1p, PZ-1p, Z-1,
> PZ-1 Z-5p, Z-5, Z-10, PZ-10, Z-20, PZ-20, Z-50p, Z-70, PZ-70, MZ-S MZ-M,
> ZX-M, MZ-5, ZX-5, MZ-5n, ZX-5n, MZ-10, ZX-10, MZ-6, ZX-L, MZ-7, ZX-7,
> MZ-30, ZX-30, MZ-50, ZX-50, MZ-60, ZX-60, *ist, *ist D series, K100D,
> K110D, K100D Super, K200D, K-m, K2000, K10D, and K20D.
>
> does not strike me as an example of an historical practise of ideal
> nomenclatural disambiguation.
>
> I'd consider "SF10" and "SFXn" to sound at least vaguely similar when
> spoken; three P30s, many MZs, ZXs, Zs, PZs in there, too.
>
> The original KM went out of production in 1977, and the folks who
> remember it as an active product will be getting thin on the ground at
> Pentax.  (Presumably especially in marketing.)
>
> Also, to a kanji reader, KM and K-m are going to be obviously different;
> if you can tell 鳥 and 馬apart as a regular thing (that's "bird" and
> "horse" and I only know about this from having had to print Chinese
> output in a previous life; I can neither speak nor read it) so I suspect
> the folks at Pentax think the name is the same.
>
> -- Graydon
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 05:56:02PM -0500, JC OConnell scripsit:
>> when in the past did they have new models that "sounded" just like old
>
>> models?
>>
>> JC O'Connell
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
>> Of Graydon
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 5:52 PM
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> Subject: Re: Whats with recent Pentax Camera names?
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 05:32:49PM -0500, JC OConnell scripsit:
>> > Are they that thick headed/uncreative that they cant think of new
>> > model names? Its not like cars where you have a '75 KM and a '09 KM.
>
>> > They are both model KM(K-M). Thats lazy if not stupid. I dont think
>> > there is any big marketing value in "KM" either like calling it a
>> > K1000 or LX or something.
>>
>> They could call it Cloud of Weasels, too, but it (I suspect) is a
>> conscious move to get away from number names.  No one ever knows if
>> you're supposed to count down (the 1 is the best one), up (the 1000 is
>
>> the best one), or if the 110 is better than the 100i.
>>
>> I'm half expecting they're actually using "m" for "mille", thousand;
>> this is the K2000 but that abbreviates to K-m, so the next one is the
>> K-m2, etc. until someone decides a nomenclature refresh is in order
>> again.  (Or maybe 3, in a fit of wild consistency with the abandoned
>> numerical system.)
>>
>> If so, that would make the K300D the K-c ("centi", hundred), the K30D
>> the K-d ("decem", "decim", "deci", etc.; ten), and the
>> much-hypothesized K3D the K-u ("unus", one) but even Pentax marketing
>> might balk at that. I certainly hope they'll balk at K-p ("primus",
>> first), so perhaps the pro model will be the only one to retain its
>> numeric designation.  Or maybe they'll decide "P is for pro" just as
>> readily as "M is for mama". ("C is for competent", "D is for
>> determined"?)
>>
>> It's got the sort of demented logic to it that Pentax marketing has
>> been known to use in the past.
>>
>> -- Graydon
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>
>> follow the directions.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to