Ann, shouldn't that be "wide angel"? <BG>

Jack


--- On Thu, 12/4/08, ann sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> From: ann sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: The Arch
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
> Date: Thursday, December 4, 2008, 8:53 AM
> RIck - I'm enjoyng the train station ones especially --
> although I'm not 
> crazy about fish eye
> shots (i.e., I'd never use a fish eye lens myself - I
> hardle ever use 
> wide angle)
> 
> I like the minamalist corner of the arch the best of those 
> - when I 
> went to the Arch it
> was just after the 1993 flood... quite a different
> surrounding area then.
> 
> ann
> 
> Rick Womer wrote:
> 
> >Thanks, Christine!
> >
> >Still a few St Louis pix to show; then next week
> I'd like to post a few from the UK (if I can get some
> time to process them).
> >
> >Rick
> >
> >http://photo.net/photos/RickW
> >
> >
> >--- On Thu, 12/4/08, Christine Aguila
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >  
> >
> >>Hi Rick:  Reflection is very, very nice.  It's
> my fav of
> >>the 4.  I'm less keen on the other three not
> because
> >>they are not technically good--they are--just that
> I'm
> >>not so keen on the content.  Still, you've an
> excellent
> >>run of shots going here.  It's been great to
> see your
> >>pics from your recent travels.  Cheers, Christine
> >>
> >>
> >>----- Original Message ----- From: "Rick
> Womer"
> >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>To: <[email protected]>
> >>Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 8:54 PM
> >>Subject: PESO: The Arch
> >>
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >>>Four views of St. Louis's best-known
> landmark:
> >>>
> >>>Reflection:
> >>>http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=8317497
> >>>(K10D, DA 16-45, polarizer, ISO 400, f/9.5 @
> 1/90,
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>handheld, RAW via LR2)
> >>    
> >>
> >>>Minimalist:
> >>>http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=8317495
> >>>(same everything, but f/19 @ 1/30.  I have no
> idea why
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>I used that exposure...)
> >>    
> >>
> >>>Sort of abstract:
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=8317489&size=lg
> >>    
> >>
> >>>(DA 50-200, polarizer, ISO 400, f/5.6 @ 1/125.
> More
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>sensible.)
> >>    
> >>
> >>>Southern base minimalist:
> >>>http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=8317498
> >>>(DA 16-45, polarizer, ISO 280, f/5.6 @ 1/90)
> >>>
> >>>Stories that Illinois (across the river) was
> going to
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>erect a giant statue of Lincoln holding a croquet
> mallet are
> >>entirely apocryphal.
> >>    
> >>
> >>>Rick
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>--
> >>>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >>>[email protected]
> >>>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >>>to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
> link
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>directly above and follow the directions.
> >>    
> >>
> >>
> >>--
> >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >>[email protected]
> >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >>to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
> >>directly above and follow the directions.
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >
> >      
> >
> >--
> >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >[email protected]
> >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
> directly above and follow the directions.
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> 
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
> directly above and follow the directions.


      

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to