Given the number of cameras are still around that take 620, 122, 616,
and other long gone film sizes didn't keep Kodak et al from killing
the manufacture of them.
By the way, John. I do have here in front of me a roll of PX-122 (Plus-
X), 1966; 1 cartridge of VP-126-12 Verichrome Pan (B&W) 1969; 1
cartridge of C-126-20 Kodacolor ][ 1977; 1 roll of CX-620 Kodacolor-X
1970; 1 roll of VP-620 Verichrome Pan 1970; 1 roll of VP-127
Verichrome Pan 1964; 3 roll pack of Metro 127 Panchromatic Fine Grain
Film ASA 80 (re-spooled from Kodak bulk film, it says); 3 rolls of
Plus-X Pan film for Minolta-16 cameras; 2 rolls PX-Pan for Minox); 1
roll unidentified (but looks Kodak Yellow foil wrapped spool slightly
smaller than 127 film; 2 spools of Single-8 Fujichrome R25 in prepaid
boxes 1967; 2 rolls of KM-429 double 8mm rolls of Kodachrome 25
1975; 1 25 ft. magazine of Cine-Kodak Kodachrome Eight ( ASA 25)
July, 1945; 2 Super-8 Kodachrome 40 Type A cartridges; 1 Super-8
Kodachrome ][ Type A cartridge; 1 Super-8 Ektachrome 160 Type G
cartridge; and finally, about a dozen cartridges of 110 Kodacolor ]
[ film for my Pentax Auto 110 in the freezer, if you are interested in
starting a new thread here...
(Note the mention of the Pentax Auto 110, please)
Joseph McAllister
Lots of gear, not much time
On Nov 20, 2008, at 16:33 , Bob W wrote:
This M42 DSLR would fill a demand that already exists
What makes you think this demand exists? Just because Pentax sold an
awful
lot of M42 lenses over the years doesn't mean that there are
thousands or
millions of people, or however many are needed to constitute a viable
market, yearning for a DSLR to stick them on.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
