In a message dated 12/10/01 1:27:53 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > "The usual stupid Mafud response."
Nothing in my post is a "response" but original questions. Why does my posting bother you so? And I'm "stupid" to ask a question? > the original poster was > satisfied with his digital experience...'nuff said." Why do you and other have to make your own statements third person? Or aren't you certain of what you're saying? > he poster has no responsibility to answer when Mafud questions..." But then, neither did you. Until you or someone by-damn takes me off this list, I'll post when and where I please, and on what topics I find a need to > > > And why, 'Jerry in Houston," didn't you answer my legitimate, open > questions yourself instead of starting something with me you can't finish? > ____________________________________________ > In a message dated 12/10/2001 9:56:47 AM Central Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > Questions: > > Are your digital images crafted as well (refined, sharp, compositionally) > > as > > your film photos? > >> > (excluding learning how to print digital prints)? > > Does ~(ANY)~ under $2,000USD digital camera let you do what a $200 Spot > can > > > > do? > > When will "Yeah, but" or "It's almost as good" vanish from the digital > > lexicon? > > > Mafud [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
