On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 8:17 AM, Steve Larson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just curious that's all, I'll be getting a digital soon too. If you can't > beat em, join em, lol. The wife blew off > 87 snaps yesterday at a school event yesterday, she is in hog heaven. I > guess the point I am trying to get across > is if you have the ability to fire 20 shots at the same subject, are you > going to take the same amount of set-up > time for f/stop, exposure, background, composition, etc. as you would with > film? >
Hey, Steve, Nice to see you again! How's it going? I think digital has allowed me to shoot more good shots, because I'm not so inhibited as I used to be - I can experiment a bit more and generally shoot at will, capturing things I'd have never "wasted" film on before. Turns out that some of those shots aren't so bad after all. That being said, I think my best film shots were better than my best digital shots, and maybe that's because I was inhibited and took more care with each shot, film being a relatively precious resource. I'd say overall, I think digital has improved my shooting. <audible gasp from crowd> cheers, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
