They may well have their heads jammed... All I'm saying I'd that ACR isn't the right tool to use.
Godfrey - www.gdgphoto.com On May 10, 2008, at 3:25 PM, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi" > Subject: Re: K20D Hot Pixels > > >> >> On May 10, 2008, at 3:05 PM, William Robb wrote: >> >>> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp? >>> forums=1036&message=27852469 >>> >>> Zero dead, Zero hot using ACR to convert the RAW files, then saved >>> as tiffs and tested using the >>> dead/hot pixel test that Starzen technologies wrote. >>> Maybe I'm missing something, but it sounds like DPReview has their >>> heads in dark smelly places >>> again. >> >> Camera Raw does hot/dead pixel removal automatically so you can't use >> it as a test for dead pixels. >> >> I used VueScan, which doesn't do dead pixel removal, when I tested >> the *ist DS but I don't see VueScan listing either the K10D or K20D >> as supported so far. > > So the DPReview guys don't have their heads up their asses? > This is something I'd have to pay money to see? > I'll take blissful ignorance on this one. > > Thanks > > William Robb > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
