Well, your results speak for themselves, the dandelion especially D
Toine wrote: > Build quality is very very good. It's a limited. Never touched the > newer 50 and 100 macros. I have a F100 macro which feels like a tank. > The focusing ring of the DA35 is very smooth and solid. Manual > focusing is a pleasure. > > > On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Derby Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Toine wrote: >> >>> A few samples: >>> http://www.repiuk.nl/peso >>> Clicking on the images loads the full size jpg. >>> >>> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Toine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> It finally arrived and collected this gem today. >>>> My first limited and the build quality is amazing. The test shots are >>>> all very sharp and excellent contrast. Macro up to 1:1, very difficult >>>> to get sharp pics at 1:1 handheld, SR doesn't help. The build in hood >>>> must slide back or else the subject is allmost inside the hood. No bug >>>> hunting with this lens. >>>> Should be a very nice walkaround lens. >>>> >>>> Toine >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> I've been put off the DA macros from the DA50 I have. Lovely sharp lens, >> but the build quality just isn't up to par with the old FAs. Sounds like >> the DA*35 is much better in that respect, would you say, Toine? Might >> keep an eye out for one. >> >> D >> >> -- >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. >> >> > > -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
