Thanks for pointing this out, but I'm not overly impressed with Mike's observations here.. In his first example, he applied gaussian blur, so that one couldn't determine what was in focus. In his second example, it was easy to see what was in focus and what was not. I've found that being able to adjust focal points with the K20D is a big advantage with primes, as they're consistent across the range. Zooms, on the other hand are a bit less consistent, and one is best trying to strike an average. Mike doesn't really deal with the nuts and bolts of it all. He just tells us that expensive cameras are better. I think we already knew that. On Apr 21, 2008, at 4:00 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: > Provides some insight as to why more and more focusing issues are > being > complained about from users of all brands, especially why it seems > to be > getting more common as DSLR resolution goes up. Best thing Mike J's > written in some time: > > http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/ > 2008/04/focus.html > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions.
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
