Mark Roberts wrote:
Tim Sherburne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thibouille, we all know that what you really meant to say was that a 200mm
lens is still a 200mm lens regardless of the size of the sensitized material
you stick it in front of.
I expect Thibouille knows this and that's why he used the word
"equivalent" rather than saying a 200mm lens becomes a 300mm on a DSLR.
Unlike a certain An"troll"io who used to hang around here, and who
insisted for a very long thread that "equivalent to" and "becomes" mean
*exactly* the same thing ...
