On 27/6/05, Tim Øsleby, discombobulated, unleashed: >Even you Cotty was positive, until you came with this rubbish about the >rubbish :-)
Nonesense. It was entirely positive. I was merely pointing out that there was some rubbish going on in the foreground, and that a positive action would be to go and tackle the subject again (you hinted that you pass the spot on a work journey). Photographers revisiting a scene many times in different weather and lighting situations in order to study the many and varied ways said scene can be captured on film or sensor, or even canvas for that matter, is common. Here's a tree I pass many times a year: <http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/landscapes/images/pic7.html> and a couple of years later... <http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/landscapes/images/pic30.html> I'm about due to have another go I reckon. So here's a positive message. You did not want to have the plant so out of focus at lower right, so go back to the scene and photograph it again!!!!! Of course, it is entirely possible that you did want the plant as such an out of focus feature at lower right, in which case, it's not the plant that is rubbish, the whole pic is!!! (think of this as a challenge ;-) Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com _____________________________
