P�l Jensen wrote:
>
> Isaac wrote:
>
> > Except the fact that the camera/lens combo would be rather awkward
> > because of the larger lenses, no autofocus and stop down metering, there
> > would be no compromises... Seriously though, I can't see many pros
> > putting up with those limitations on a really expensive body, digital or
> > no...
>
> I believe most of them will use it instead of a polaroid back. For these
>applications (checking exposure, light setting etc) a digital slr with MF lenses
>might be useful
For 5 grand?!? You could buy a whole RZ setup with that kind of money.
If someone needed polaroid capability, they probably didn't buy Pentax
to begin with, and if they did, it would make more sense to invest in a
studio camera that has a conventional polaroid (or digital) back. The
price of the digital camera would have to come down significantly to
make sense as a polaroid replacement...
Isaac
>
> P�l
>
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
