----- Original Message ----- From: "P�l Jensen" Subject: Re: Medium Format to 35 (WAS: Digital MZ - MR 52 projet still in the air ???) > Rob wrote: > > > > There is no truth in the statement the MF lenses have lower MTF values > > either, > > > Whatever resolving power a MF lens has it has to be distributed over a larger area than a 35mm lens. HUH????? By that arguement, my 210mm NikkorW should only resolve about 8 LPPM. I know for a fact it resolves closer to 60 on the film. Format doesn't matter. William Robb - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- Re: Medium Format to 35 (WAS: Digital MZ - MR 52 projet st... Rob Studdert
- Re: Medium Format to 35 (WAS: Digital MZ - MR 52 proj... P�l Jensen
- Re: Medium Format to 35 (WAS: Digital MZ - MR 52 ... Tom Rittenhouse
- Re: Medium Format to 35 (WAS: Digital MZ - MR... William Robb
- Re: Medium Format to 35 (WAS: Digital MZ - MR... P�l Jensen
- Re: Medium Format to 35 (WAS: Digital MZ - MR 52 ... William Robb
- Re: Medium Format to 35 (WAS: Digital MZ - MR 52 ... Isaac Crawford
- Re: Medium Format to 35 (WAS: Digital MZ - MR 52 proj... Rob Studdert
- Some of my Grandfather Mountain stuf online Mark Roberts
- Re: Medium Format to 35 Todd Stanley
- Re: Medium Format to 35 (WAS: Digital MZ - MR 52 ... Isaac Crawford
- Re: Medium Format to 35 (WAS: Digital MZ - MR 52 proj... Rob Studdert

