FWIW, I sold a LN m100 2.8 a couple of months ago on ebay and it ended up selling at $150.00 jco
-----Original Message----- From: Keith Whaley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2004 12:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: KEH M100/2.8 Peter J. Alling wrote: > The optical formulas are different, the focal lengths are different. > Actually, the biggest difference I know of is the K is very sharp but > some think it has rather harsh boke, (though there is some dissent > from that opinion...). The M is not quite as sharp by reputation, I > find it to be a bit soft wide open but it produces a very pleasing out > of focus rendition. Sharp enough stopped down however, in my opinion. > Usually the M-100 can be purchased for quite a bit less than the K-105. > Though the $49.00 price on the ebay auction probably won't stand. Dang well better not, since I paid almost 10 times that number for mine! keith whaley > Jens Bladt wrote: > >> Do you know in which way this differs from the K 2.8/105mm, which I >> like a lot? It's quite sharp even at F2.8. >> >> Jens Bladt >> -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- >> Fra: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sendt: 31. oktober 2004 10:22 >> Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Emne: RE: KEH M100/2.8 >> >> >> On 31 Oct 2004 at 10:07, Shen wrote: >> >>> I don't think it is cheap. >>> >>> Please see >>> >>> SMC-M 100mm / f2.8 >>> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=3848 >> Not for long... >> >> Rob Studdert
