Peter J. Alling wrote:
The optical formulas are different, the focal lengths are different.
Actually, the biggest difference I know of is the K is very sharp but some think it has rather harsh boke, (though there is some dissent from that opinion...).
The M is not quite as sharp by reputation, I find it to be a bit soft wide open but it produces a very pleasing out of focus rendition. Sharp enough stopped down however, in my opinion.
Usually the M-100 can be purchased for quite a bit less than the K-105. Though the $49.00 price on the ebay auction probably won't stand.
Dang well better not, since I paid almost 10 times that number for mine!
keith whaley
Jens Bladt wrote:
Do you know in which way this differs from the K 2.8/105mm, which I like a lot? It's quite sharp even at F2.8.
Jens Bladt
-----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 31. oktober 2004 10:22 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: RE: KEH M100/2.8
On 31 Oct 2004 at 10:07, Shen wrote:
I don't think it is cheap.
Please see
SMC-M 100mm / f2.8 http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=3848
Not for long...
Rob Studdert
