I would have to email them to you, how big is your inbox? 2mb or bigger? John
---------- Original Message ----------- From: "David Zaninovic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 10:33:48 -0400 Subject: Re: fisheye for normal looking pictures > Can I see these pictures somewhere ? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Whittingham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 10:14 AM > Subject: Re: fisheye for normal looking pictures > > > > Is it possible to take normal looking pictures with such fisheye > > > without immediately noticing that the fisheye was used, so no curved > > > lines. Are there any examples of such use ? Pictures ? I could > > > not find anything on the net about this, all the pictures have cheap > > > trick look. > > > > I have three which I took this year with a Sigma 16mm Fisheye which would > > pass unless of course you knew they were shot with a fisheye. A couple of > > members on the list commented on them after I mistakenly emailed them to the > > wrong person Paul? (brain fade, at work) > > > > I've seen others such as a shore line passing diagonally through the frame > > which disguise the effect well, a little carefull composition being the key. > > > > John > > > > > > > > ---------- Original Message ----------- > > From: "David Zaninovic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:57:59 -0400 > > Subject: fisheye for normal looking pictures > > > > > Is it possible to take normal looking pictures with such fisheye > > > without immediately noticing that the fisheye was used, so no curved > > > lines. Are there any examples of such use ? Pictures ? I could > > > not find anything on the net about this, all the pictures have cheap > > > trick look. > > > > > > > > > for the MZ-S. Just remember that there are only so many uses for a > > > > > > fisheye as compared to, say a 50/1.4. > > ------- End of Original Message ------- > > ------- End of Original Message -------
