Okay, thanks, Mishka. t
On 10/26/04 17:12, Mishka wrote: > not zenitar. zenitar is fine. > > mir 20mm/2.5 does interfere. but *unlike* zenitar, nothing says that the > filter should always be used. > > best, > mishka. > > > On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 09:04:30 -0700, Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Doug... Someone else mentioned that the Zenitar's rear filters interfere >> with the mirrors on the A series bodies. Have you noticed any problems with >> the MZ-S? >> >> t >> >> >> >> On 10/26/04 8:09, Doug Franklin wrote: >> >>> I also have the Zenitar 16/2.8 fisheye and have been really pleased >>> with it. As someone else mentioned, the colors are a bit more vivid >>> through this lens than my others, but it's also a sharp lens that >>> handles flare better than most of my non-Pentax lenses. It's built >>> like a tank, and my aperture ring is a little notchy, as someone else >>> also mentioned. But overall, it's the best $130 I've spent on a single >>> piece of camera gear, with the possible exception of the battery grip >>> for the MZ-S. Just remember that there are only so many uses for a >>> fisheye as compared to, say a 50/1.4. >>> >>> TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ >> >> > > >
