I don't even have the 77 and have to agree with Alan. My FA*85 is one of my favorite lenses, but I only use it for portraits.
Dave -----Original Message----- From: Alan Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004 1:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 77 vs 85/was: www? IMHO, FA*85/1.4 is great for portrait, and only. I used it for scenery, and close-up with extension tubes, but the results were disappointing. FA77/1.8 performs more even for different subjects. Alan Chan http://www.pbase.com/wlachan >Thanks for all your comments! >So it seems that a 28-105 zoom would be a versatile solution. >OR a FA77mm/FA85mm. The last two lenses are both expensive critters. >Reading the lens comments about them - especially about the FA85/1.4 - is >confusing. Which one is the better lens for over-all photography (people, >street, landscapes)? By the way: does anyone know how/where to find a black >77Ltd. Its on Bojidar's site but not offered for sale anywhere. >TIA >Peter, Sweden
