Hi, Juan.

Good to have you back. Congrats on the purchase!
Paul Stenquist and Cotty recently proved to me with one of my own
images that the *ist D can deliver images to be enlarged to A3. That's
sufficient quality for me for a good while. At least until a digital
alternative using my Pentax 645 lenses comes along...LOL

Cheers,
Jostein

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Juan J. Buhler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 1:26 AM
Subject: *ist D for me


>
> Hello everybody,
>
> Been gone from the list for a long while. I've been shooting a bit,
> but mainly with the M6.
>
> Anyway, given a bit of a lack of inspiration period I've been going
> through, I decided that a new toy would help me get going again, so
I
> decided to finally bite the bullet and get a DSLR. Given the many
> lenses I already have and love (FA35 2, K85 1.8, K24 3.5, K30 2.8,
A50
> 1.4, etc etc), the *ist D was the obvious choice. Looks like K and M
> lenses will work in manual metering now, so that's sweet.
>
> Of course, as soon as I started researching the camera, many things
> became apparent: Pentax is about to announce something
> better/cheaper/faster, Canon just announced an 8Mp SLR for $200
less,
> etc etc etc...  So I decided to stop reading the PDML and rumour
sites
> online, and just order on from Adorama. I guess I'll skip whatever
> Pentax announces next and then get the 18 megapixel special edition
LX
> that they'll anounce in Photokina 2017.
>
> Anyway, UPS says my ist and 16-45 will be here tomorrow. Nothing to
> ask the list, just saying hi and sharing the excitement...
>
> j
>
>
> PS: BTW, I'll be driving across most of the USA from San Francisco
to
> Ohio starting this coming weekend. Looking forward to see how the
istD
> sees America...
>
> --
>  -------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
>  Juan J. Buhler | Lead FX Animator @ PDI | Photos at
http://www.jbuhler.com
>  -------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
>
>

Reply via email to