Hi All! I guess the point I was making was we don't have to worry about film vanishing in the next year or two. For those of us who still use film it will become more of a hassle and we will have to decide when enough is enough. I agree that my older bodies will probably outlast my zx/mz's. That's why I hang on to them. I WILL buy a dgi SLR, but not until I find one with more "bang for the buck" than the D. I simply won't spend that much to make my M lenses HARDER to use, why go thru a learning curve to go backwards?
I apologise if I'm not keeping up well with this thread but I'm only recieving every other post or so. Haven't even seen a copy of my own, been pretty bad lately. Hard to follow when the list gods only let you see responses and not original posts. Don -----Original message----- From: Henri Toivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 11:35:51 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 35 vs digi - Some points to ponder. > Gonz wrote: > > > Is any record company making LPs anymore? You can buy new turntables, > > but it appears that all LPs are legacy copies. > > > > rg > > There are lots of new LP's made. They are a bit more difficult to find > and get hold of though. Electronic music and Hardrock especially. > > /Henri >
