But that way, one would loose the benefits of rangefinder/TLR-like viewing. Which are tremendous. I thing I would still like the pellicle concept, the best is that you both see the subject all the time, even during exposure, and that is has SLR precise framing, unlike RFs. Why did I then enter into the discussion on LCD mirrors ;-) ?
Of course, the downside of pellicle mirrors is that light can leak back through the viewfinder and cause veiling flare... you'd need some kind of optional viewfinder shutter - perhaps an LCD in front of the eyepiece?
S
