Me three! I would love a 55-200/4 DA to go with the 16-45. Same image quality as the 16-45. That would be superb!
Bruce Thursday, June 24, 2004, 8:53:24 AM, you wrote: aw> On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Nenad Djurdjevic wrote: >> Steve Desjardins wrote: >> > I think we could see more of the f4 zooms. Pentax can make an opticaaly >> > superior lens but keep the price down. Although, to be honest, a >> > lesser 2.8 zoom at Tokina prices might serve them better. OTOH, slow >> > zooms might be a good paln with in-camera IS. >> >> How about an f2.8 DA zoom that goes from 45-140? That would be the same as >> a 35mm 70-210 f2.8. I would buy that! aw> Me too. I'd take an f4 version too. aw> I'd love to see more high quality, one stop slower than pro, smaller aw> lenses for Pentax. I think that this would fit in well with their aw> current direction. That probably means that they won't do it. aw> alex
