$50 is too high. I got mine for $20 or $25 I think. I wouldn't pay more than $30 for it.
Personally, I loved it. Some people say it's soft. I couldn't tell with largish prints. It isn't multicoated, so don't shoot into the sun. Otherwise, I thought it was a fantastic portrait lens. I sold mine when I bought the *ist D, and it's probably my only non-A lens that I regret letting go.... Christian Skofteland [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jon M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 5:37 PM Subject: Takumar 135/2.5 (Bayonet) any good? > http://kmp.bdimitrov.de/lenses/primes/_non-SMC/tak_135f2.5.html > > A local shop has one in his inventory, and is asking > $50 for it. There are no reviews of it on Stan's page. > I was wondering if any of y'all have any experience > with this lens, or any insight as to whether it'd be a > decent addition to my small but growing collection of > K-mount goodies? > > Thanks. > -Jon Myers. > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. > http://messenger.yahoo.com/ >
