BTW: I have found that the 80-200/2.8 wide open makes a fine portrait lens.
-- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
- Re: 77 limited or 85* for portraits/canndids Bill D. Casselberry
- Re: 77 limited or 85* for portraits/canndids Shel Belinkoff
- RE: 77 limited or 85* for portraits/canndids Jose R. Rodriguez
- RE: 77 limited or 85* for portraits/canndids tom
- Re: 77 limited or 85* for portraits/canndids Alan Chan
- Re: 77 limited or 85* for portraits/canndids Alan Chan
- Re: 77 limited or 85* for portraits/canndids Cotty
- RE: 77 limited or 85* for portraits/canndids Cotty
- Re: 77 limited or 85* for portraits/canndids Cotty
- Re: 77 limited or 85* for portraits/canndids Gianfranco Irlanda
- Re: 77 limited or 85* for portraits/canndids Mark Roberts
- Re: 77 limited or 85* for portraits/canndids Dario Bonazza
- Re: 77 limited or 85* for portraits/canndids Shel Belinkoff
- Re: 77 limited or 85* for portraits/canndids Kostas Kavoussanakis
- Re: 77 limited or 85* for portraits/canndids Gianfranco Irlanda
- Re: 77 limited or 85* for portraits/canndids Derby Chang
- Re: 77 limited or 85* for portraits/canndids Antonio Aparicio
