I am curious about something. Now I really sort of like this photo.
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/pages/blurry.htm But it would have driven my former teacher nuts because nothing is sharp. (The wind was blowing.) I sort of like the impressionistic feel of it. But then, I often like things others don't, and don't think some area of super sharpness is the primary requirement in every photo. So I am curious: 1. Would the lack of real sharpness in any spot really bother you? 2. Or if you don't like it, is that reaction unrelated to the blurriness -- i.e. you don't like flowers, you don't like the composition, you think something else could be better, etc. 3. None of the above. Anyone can answer. Still relatively new to photography, I am not always sure how others evaluate things. I know how I do and that's about it. Marnie aka Doe Or maybe I want to get two PAW reactions for the price of one. ;-)
