On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Butch Black wrote: > Alex wrote: > > It would be really nice if 8x12 inkjet photo paper was more widely > available. I like this school of thought, but purchasing 13x19 paper > and chopping it up just to make 8x12 prints isn't much fun. > > > I agree. You do realize that you can easily nest 2 8X12's on one sheet of > 13x19 paper.
Yes, that is why I picked it instead of 11x17. Cutting up paper is still no fun compared to just using an off the shelf solution. These days I usually do full-bleed 8.5x11 prints because they only require minor cropping from 2:3 or 3:4 and don't require trimming the paper. A sheet of 13x19 paper costs a lot more than a sheet of 8.5x11 paper. alex
