... and so is black. What drivel Smaller is better, bigger is better, this camera garners "respect ..." WTF is that? Go over to the Leica list and you'll find a lot of pros using M cameras for certain types of PJ work, or documentary work, and even in corporate boardrooms. These same pros will use Canon digis for some work or the leica R bodies ... and y'know what, none of these pros pull a "Rodney Dangerfied" I don't get no respect because of my camera.
These pros are hired for results, and choose the gear they use based on numerous factors. Now if some schmuck in a Tuxedo on his wedding day things a bigger camera is better, maybe he also thinks a bigger penis is better for the honeymoon. Perhaps his wife will "straighten" him out on that point. True, there are perceptions of what a "pro" camera is supposed to be, but the savvy clients know that the only thing that counts are results, not the size of the lens or the number of frames per second that can be blasted off, or how big and how black that thing is hanging around your neck. Maybe it's not just the clients that need reassurance, but perhaps the photogs need it as well. shel William Robb wrote: > OTOH, as soon as you are working directly with a client, often the > larger camera garners instant respect. > This, in turn, can actually lead to better photos, as it is one more > thing that puts the client at ease about the job.
