Slightly over a year ago I read, with great excitement,  that Pentax would
be coming out with a dslr.  That excitement slowly was tempered when I
gradually learned that it wouldn't be compatible with K and M lenses.
Even with the firmware improvement,  I still am reluctant to spend my hard
earn money on it.

Jim A.


> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 23:04:18 -0600 (CST)
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: why buy *istD
> Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 00:26:27 -0500
> 
>> From: alex wetmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> 
>> People who never owned a Pentax camera before on dpreview seem to be
>> buying the *ist D for a couple of reasons:
>> * They like the user interface and look and feel
> 
> I can understand this, although personally I prefer the D100, probably due
> to greater familiarity with the "Nikon Way" than the "Electronic Pentax
> Way" (I liked the UI on the K1000...)
> 
>> * They like the small size
> 
> It's got competition there, if perhaps not equally-featured competition.
> I can also understand the desire for small size.  My girlfriend really
> likes the *istD because it fits her hands well.  I have a bit of trouble
> handling the thing, although the makes-it-heavier grip might help.
> 
>> I expect that if you ask most members of this list why they bought
>> a Pentax SLR in the first place that those would be two common answers.
>> The other is probably the quality of lenses.
> 
> IMHO Pentax has NOTHING on the other guys here, although it may
> well give you better quality for the same price and have more
> useful gradations in price/quality (Canon seems to have no "middle level"
> lenses). 
> 
>> I personally wouldn't a Canon tomorrow if all of my gear was stolen.
>> The cameras and lenses are big and I don't like their UI.
> 
> I'll tolerate big, expensive gear if it gives me capabilities that I need
> and cannot get elsewhere.  Not all Canon gear is big and heavy either,
> although perhaps all of it worth owning is.
> 
> DJE
> 
> 

Reply via email to