As driver: cut down Range Rover racer - est. 130mph (the speedo finished
at 120)
As passenger: 170mph in a Jaguar, being taken around Silverstone to get
shots of Derek Warwick - can't remember the type as it was over ten years
ago. I remember him apologising for being slow, as it was wet...

Cotty

PS - the shots were a bit wobbly :-)

>My personal best on a public way was in my 1979 Jaguar XJ12. It was on 
>route 18 in New Jersey. I entered on route 79 and headed east toward 
>route 34. I didn't see any speed traps, so I turned around and held it 
>to the floor going the other way. 138 mph on the speedo. On a dragstrip 
>I went 187 in a 1420 pound dragster that had been broken in half in an 
>earlier crash and welded back together. It was powered by a fuel 
>injected 6.7 liter Pontiac engine running on 70% nitromethane. It blew 
>one head gasket in the lights and covered me with oil. But I was only 
>19 at the time, so my stupidity is entirely excusable. In the following 
>years I built some much faster drag cars (a Corvette that went 237 in 
>6.35 seconds) but never drove any of them. I had learned the meaning of 
>fear.
>Paul
>On Feb 23, 2004, at 8:24 PM, John Francis wrote:
>
>>>
>>> My personally driven top speed is a more modest 105mph in my first car
>>
>> I've done 120mph or more in three cars:
>>
>>  o  A Bentley R-type (on the A127 coming back from Southend).
>>     I started out running at around 80mph, and the speed gradually
>>     crept up.  Absolutely no sensation of speed.  Fortunately I
>>     didn't have to slow down rapidly, as I'm sure thar drum brakes
>>     (even if they are 14" drums) would take a long time to have
>>     much of an effect on a car that heavy going that fast.
>>
>>  o  My Triumph Vitesse on the motorway spur from the M4 to Reading.
>>     Scary - the front of the car was almost lifting off the road.
>>
>>  o  My current car - a Ford Mustang GT convertible - on route 3
>>     at around 2:00 am, with no other traffic in sight.  That was
>>     in 1986, when the car was new.
>>



Reply via email to